Important Ladies’s Well being Assets: The place to Discover Proof-Primarily based Data

Please notice: On this article, the time period ‘ladies’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender identity.

Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being data shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.

In a political local weather the place ladies’s our bodies are continuously underneath hearth, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.

These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re very important sources on every little thing from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and medical trial variety. The form of data that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers individuals to make knowledgeable decisions about their our bodies.

And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little rationalization and 0 accountability. If that appears like a warfare on ladies, nicely… you’re not fallacious.

When politics begins dictating what well being data we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to battle again. Which means getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to unbiased, science-backed women’s health resources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to resolve what we do or don’t need to learn about our personal rattling our bodies.

Why Authorities-Equipped Well being Data is Disappearing

For many years, federal well being businesses just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA have been go-to sources for reliable medical data. However in latest months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: hundreds of pages of girls’s well being content material have quietly vanished.

This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.

Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed probably the most.

What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues

Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness data is important to the well-being of girls. But the U.S. authorities has just lately modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages^1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steering.

These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This consists of very important public well being data on subjects akin to HIV and sexually transmitted ailments, contraceptive utilization and security, medical trial variety, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.^1,2,3,4.

Who This Impacts Most

The suppression of this data disproportionately impacts ladies, minorities, and different marginalized people.

With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face vital challenges in making knowledgeable selections about therapy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.

Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply limit entry to information—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.

[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]

Fortuitously, there are advocates on the market working to archive this data and make it accessible to the general public⁵. This article comprises a listing of those recovered sources.

The Political Undermining of Public Well being

Whereas the transition of presidency from one celebration to a different mustn’t have an effect on the provision of evidence-based well being and wellness data, it has. This alarming development highlights the pressing want for unbiased, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.

The Position of Advocacy Organizations

Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance ladies’s well being by means of coverage, schooling, and science.

For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Sex as a Biological Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a crucial step in making certain that ailments, remedies, and medical interventions are researched with ladies’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.

The well being wants of girls change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by means of menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more crucial.

Trusted, Proof-Primarily based Ladies’s Well being Assets

Under is a curated record of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steering tailor-made to the distinctive well being considerations of girls of their reproductive years, throughout the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By in search of out and sharing these sources, we are able to collectively safeguard entry to very important well being information and be certain that all ladies have the knowledge they should thrive at each stage of life.

Teen/Reproductive Years: 

Reproductive Health Access Project
Trains and helps major care clinicians to broaden entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Affords free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person schooling supplies and advocates for fairness in medical coaching and care.

Perimenopause/Menopause:

The North American Menopause Society
A number one unbiased group providing evidence-based data on menopause and midlife ladies’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.

A number of Life Phases:

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed ladies’s well being data. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an lively position of their care.

Planned Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and schooling. Advocates for inexpensive, high-quality providers and is the biggest supplier of intercourse schooling within the U.S.

Our Bodies Ourselves
Affords rigorously vetted well being and sexuality data that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of girls and gender-expansive people.

Healthy Women
Centered on ladies aged 35 to 64, this group supplies medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome growing old and empowered self-advocacy.

Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Women’s Mental Health: Reproductive Psychiatry Resource & Information Center
Affords reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life phases, with specialised help for BIPOC people in search of culturally aligned care.

Center for Science in the Public Interest
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by means of diet, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.

Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered

In a time when entry to reliable well being data is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply essential—it’s a type of resistance. Each individual deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that help knowledgeable decisions, not political agendas.

So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Help the organizations doing the arduous work to maintain this data alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t value combating for. As a result of it’s. At all times. —Karin

References

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
2. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
3. https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
4. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
5. https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
6. https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says